Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

had a source of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "had a source of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the origin or provider of something, such as information, support, or resources. Example: "The researcher had a source of reliable data that supported her findings."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

Gilligan had a source of sorts: Kelly.

News & Media

The Guardian

"It's only there because it had a source of fresh water for the railroad," Bragg notes.

There's a good chance that if you had a source of income last year, you'll have it this year.

And the sun being almost completely eclipsed meant that we had a source of illumination which was more like a point source than a big, diffuse source.

News & Media

The Guardian

Rukia, with his love of law and order, could never keep out of anyone else's business, while Matagubya had a source of banana beer.

News & Media

The Guardian

If the Yankees had a source of angst through their serene beginnings, it was the sight of Vazquez being battered around in his first two starts.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

37 human-written examples

"Do we have a source of infection?" I asked.

News & Media

The New Yorker

He doesn't have a source of income now.

News & Media

The New York Times

That is to say, Rose will always have a source of income.

They have a source of propulsion and can be controlled in all three axes of flight.

"Because now you have a source of pluripotent cells that doesn't require the problematic destruction of a human embryo".

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "had a source of", ensure that the type of source is clearly specified to provide context and clarity to the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "had a source of" without specifying the nature of the source. For instance, instead of saying "they had a source of information", specify "they had a source of reliable data" or "they had a source of expert opinion".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "had a source of" functions as a verb phrase indicating possession or access to something that serves as an origin, provider, or supply. As seen in Ludwig's examples, it connects a subject to the origin of a resource or piece of information.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

31%

News & Media

29%

Wiki

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

8%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "had a source of" is grammatically sound and commonly used across a variety of contexts to indicate possession of or access to an origin or provider. As Ludwig AI specifies, this correct and versatile phrase finds application in domains ranging from science and news to everyday communication. To ensure clarity, specify the type of source, whether it be information, resources, or support, when using this phrase.

FAQs

How can I use "had a source of" in a sentence?

Use "had a source of" to indicate possession or access to something that provides what is needed. For example, "The company had a source of funding for its new project."

What can I say instead of "had a source of"?

You can use alternatives like "possessed an origin of", "maintained a provider of", or "benefited from a supply of" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "had a source for" instead of "had a source of"?

While "had a source for" isn't grammatically incorrect, "had a source of" is more commonly used when referring to the origin or provider of something. "Had a source for" might be used when indicating a reason or justification for something.

What's the difference between "had a source of" and "had access to"?

"Had a source of" implies possession of an origin or provider, while "had access to" indicates the ability to obtain or use something, regardless of direct ownership. The former is a more direct statement of origin.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: