Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The cross-sectional studies had a mean scale score of 5.4/10.
Z-scores were based on performance of the healthy controls, which by definition had a mean scale score of 0 and SD set to 1.
The IADCQ had a mean scale score of 21.6 and a standard deviation of 10.8, which indicated that the majority of individuals within the Web-based participant population were likely to score along the scale continuum of 10.8 through 32.4.
Similar(57)
The first to third fluid boluses given to patients had a mean scaled SVI increase of 10.2 ± 43%, the fourth to seventh 12 ± 36% and the eight and later 18 ± 35%.
Eight of 11 unique variants (73%) had scaled CADD scores >10, placing them in the top 10% most deleterious single nucleotide variants; as a group, the 11 variants had a mean scaled CADD score of 32.6, ranking higher than 99.95% of all possible human single nucleotide variants (Kircher et al., 2014).
The bully scale had a mean score of 26.8 (SD = 3.92) and a reliability of α = 0.87.
Method quality of the trials, assessed using the PEDro scale, had a mean score of five (range three to seven).
The total satisfaction scale had a mean score of 38 and SD of 22.
The telephone contact scale had a mean score of 80.6, while organization at the casualty clinic had a mean score of 64.7.
WE had a mean score of 4.1 (sd=0.8) on a scale from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing more favourable WE.
Obstetricians (n=239) had a mean score of 34.43 on the scale (SD = 9.75) and a median score of 33 (5th, 95th percentiles: 21, 51).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com