Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Most of the studies that had a human proctor present for the control group also had one present for the intervention group.
Less than half of the multimedia (44%) and enhanced consent (14%) trials had a human proctor present for the administration of either informed consent procedure.
Subgroup analyses (Table 6) demonstrated that the improvement in understanding scores was larger in simulation studies (vs. real-setting studies) and in studies in which neither study arm (intervention or control) had a human proctor.
Similar(57)
Monitoring of the online examination using a human proctor or electronic proctoring software coupled with biometrics to ensure the identity of the test-taker is recommended by most researchers (Bedford, Gregg, & Clinton, 2011; Caldarola & MacNeil, 2009; Chiesl, 2007; Foster, Mattoon, & Shearer, 2008; Harmon, Lambrinos, & Buffolino, 2010; Trenholme, 2006-2007; Watson & Sottile, 2010).
Relatedly, Bickmore et al. tested an interactive computer-based proctor against two different procedures: the participant read an informed consent document alone or the participant was led through consent process by a human proctor.
Having a human touch, personal.
The reasons for heterogeneity were explored by conducting a test of interaction based on whether the intervention group had a proctor, the control group had a proctor, whether the control group was an enhanced form of the consent form or just a standard form, the setting of the study (real vs. simulated) and the type of subjects (healthy volunteers vs. patients) [ 18].
57% of the miscellaneous interventions had a proctor, while the enhanced discussion and test/feedback interventions all had human proctors.
"I pretty much have a new arm," Proctor said.
"When your body's that dry from all the booze, it's got to have an effect," Proctor said.
Long jump All summer long, Proctor had promised that she had a seven metre long jump in her.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com