Sentence examples for habitat coverage from inspiring English sources

The geographical and habitat coverage of such data make them ideal for addressing urban planning issues.

However, evaluations of PMPA efficacy in providing appropriate habitat coverage for pelagic species are lacking, particularly in the tropics.

Through this process gaps in habitat coverage are created and the ability of populations in the remaining fragments to maintain themselves is put in doubt.

Yet, despite variation both in PMPA size and shape, and in foraging behavior of the birds, we determined that the PMPAs each encapsulated more than 85% (n = 216 trips) of foraging habitat for each species, indicating that these PMPAs provided important habitat coverage for highly mobile tropical species.

While this study highlights the challenges in effectively designing PMPAs even for relatively well-studied, central place foragers, given strong variation in foraging ecologies across sites, it also suggests that PMPAs do provide meaningful habitat coverage for at least some pelagic species.

Proportions (habitat coverage with filamentous algae, emergent plants, biofilm and water stability) were arcsine transformed to normalize the data before they were analyzed.

Habitat detection coverage differed significantly among CORPs, depending on who had recruited them into the program: Detection coverage was a one-third lower among individuals that had been recruited directly through programme staff rather than through local community leaders (Table 2).

The aquatic habitat detection coverage levels varied significantly between wards (P < 0.001), probably reflecting individual geographic variation and ward-level variation in the quality of supervision [ 39].

Furthermore, the reported degree of support provided by residents to interviewed CORPs demonstrated strong influence on the observed habitat detection coverage.

Habitat detection coverage was lower among CORPs that were recruited through the program administrative staff, compared to CORPs recruited by local government officials or health committees (Odds Ratio = 0.660, 95% confidence interval = [0.438, 0.995], P = 0.047).

Consequently, there was a 47.8% reduction in habitat detection coverage among individual CORPs who reported spending an average of half an hour or more to get to their scheduled TCUs (Table 2).