Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Once again, Malebranche is guilty of anthropomorphism.
Similar(58)
Yes, partly out of anthropomorphism.
The roots of anthropomorphism go deep.
I am not against any form of anthropomorphism.
Most people are scared of showing that kind of anthropomorphism.
All wildlife TV skirts the risk of anthropomorphism.
Both have their advantages and their limits, and some level of anthropomorphism is likely inescapable.
Foster told BBC Wildlife Magazine: "The scientists who accuse me of anthropomorphism are hopelessly out of date.
(He writes papers with titles like "The Perils of Anthropomorphism" and "Pets Aren't Us").
And woe betide any student that brought any hint of anthropomorphism into their descriptions of animal behaviour".
It is that, despite the avoidance of anthropomorphism, every specimen seems firmly fixed in some human story.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com