Mohist ethics and epistemology are characterized by a concern with finding objective standards that will guide judgment and action reliably and impartially so as to produce beneficial, morally right consequences.
The affect-as-information model (Clore et al. 2001) indicates that affective feelings as a component of input in information processing can provide information and serve as crucial cues to guide judgment and decision making; therefore, affective feelings can lead to a higher or lower evaluation of a certain object.
Furthermore, if this information were read out and used to guide judgments, those judgments would match those of the rats.
Nunnally and Bernstein [ 27] also noted that results from such an exercise can guide judgments about the content validity of any items that need modification or need to be omitted.
Climate safety is a design factor guiding the judgment and behavior of health care professionals, and highlights the issue of patient safety at the top of their priorities.
Second, there are those who take the paired intuitions in the Trolley Problem as proof of the fundamental role of Double Effect as an implicit principle guiding moral judgment (Philippa Foot, 1985), John Mikhail, 2011).
In the context of Dworkin's hypothetical insurance market thought-experiment, these background intuitions might well be guiding our judgment as to which characteristics the average person would choose to insure him/herself against (and hence our view about which characteristics count as a kind of resource-deficit).
A key strength of the HCR-20 is its utility in guiding clinical judgment about risk management and it is this aspect of the instrument that has lead to its acceptance into routine clinical practice [ 13].
Hare then puts a more precise gloss on what it is for a judgment to "guide conduct": an action-guiding judgment is one which entails an answer to the practical question "What shall I do?" (Hare 1952, p. 29; see Hare 1963, p. 54 for the terminology "practical question").[3] What is it that an action-guiding judgment must entail?
Furthermore, the fact that Kuhn identified values as what guide judgment opens up the possibility that scientists ought to employ different values, as has been argued by feminist and post-colonial writers (e.g. Longino 1994).
A thoraco-abdominal CT provides an adequate baseline evaluation and guides judgment as to the resectability of CRCLM patients.
