Sentence examples for guidelines of inquiry from inspiring English sources

But without a concept of truth, how can we make sense of what Rawls says about the guidelines of inquiry, in particular his claim that citizens should rely on "plain truths now widely accepted"?

Although much of the debate regarding public reason's content has focused on the question of normative content, there are also important questions about the other aspect of public reason's content what Rawls describes as the guidelines of inquiry.

The second part of public reason, at least as presented by Rawls in Political Liberalism, are guidelines of inquiry which include principles of reasoning and rules of evidence to determine how substantive principles are to be applied, as well as important civic virtues such as reasonableness and civility (Rawls 1996, 224).

Rawls suggests that these guidelines of inquiry direct citizens to abstain from appealing to "comprehensive religious or philosophical doctrines to what we as individuals or members of associations see as the whole truth nor to elaborate economic theories of general equilibrium, say, if these are in dispute".

According to Rawls (1993: 225), "[i]n justice as fairness, and I think in many other liberal views, the guidelines of inquiry of public reason, as well as its principle of legitimacy, have the same basis as the substantive principles of justice".

The interview guideline specified four phases to provide a structured framework addressing the domains of inquiry presented in the introduction.

Interview guidelines will be developed for each group of respondents to ensure a systematic approach, with flexibility to pursue new avenues of inquiry as insights accumulate.

Furthermore, we describe a new method of inquiry into case-based decision making that can reveal controversial opinions even in the face of clear official guidelines.

Here are some potential areas of inquiry.

Two other lines of inquiry remain open.

Here two lines of inquiry developed.