Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
To design and validate a useful tool to measure the frequency with which a number of factors which could have an influence on the use of Clinical Practice Guidelines are perceived by physical therapists.
Evidence-based guidelines are perceived as useful in general, but several shortcomings are experienced in patients with multimorbidity.
According to the AXDEV-NA study, diagnosis guidelines are perceived to change often because of frequent updates, leading each Canadian health care organization to develop their own cut-off points.
Their high upfront cost has been discussed as the major limiting factor: 88% of clinicians report financial barriers as the major obstacle, while lack of expertise and lack of national guidelines are perceived as potential barriers by 61% and 51% of clinicians, respectively [ 9].
In this study we draw on the understanding of medical technologies presented in the field of science and technology studies (STS), where medical technologies and guidelines are perceived as active parts in shaping the definition of health and illness, [ 15] and thus we examine how near-patient tests influence the management of sore throat and related prescribing of antibiotics.
Similar(55)
Implementation of ACGME guidelines is perceived as NOT improving Patient Care or Medical Knowledge by 30%/43% (F/T) and reducing operative experience by 50%/70% (F/T).
The HIV guidelines were perceived as being very detailed and time consuming.
Giving instructive feedback (according to the feedback guidelines) was perceived as difficult.
Guidelines were perceived as contradictory, leading physicians to rely on treatment strategies with which they are familiar [EIMSED-NA].
Importantly, chiropractors were much more likely to use clinical practice guidelines when guidelines were perceived as aiding decisions about patient care.
Centrally produced materials, booklets, and step-by-step guidelines was perceived didactic by some participants that constraints adult participatory learning, and problem solving capabilities of the students.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com