Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
It presents the rationale for including each guideline item in SQUIRE, along with published examples of reporting for each item, and commentary on the strengths and weaknesses of those examples.
It may not always be appropriate, or even possible, to include information about every numbered guideline item in reports of original studies, but authors should at least consider every item in writing their reports.
N=total number of manuscripts; n=number of times each reporting guideline item was used (since each item might have more than one suggestion, n can be greater than N); %=manuscripts with at least one suggestion divided by total number of manuscripts (N).
The key steps include: literature reviews of relevant guidance (Stage 1) and of actual reporting practice in published research articles (Stage 2), a guideline item development workshop and Delphi consensus studies with experts (Stage 3), developing a guidance statement and accompanying explanatory document (Stages 1 4), and encouraging guideline endorsement by journals (Stage 4).
Similar(56)
Reporting guideline items were assessed by few evaluations.
Articles were assessed for the REMARK profile and other REMARK guideline items.
2 investigators independently evaluated each of the studies for adherence to the 13 individual guideline items.
No qualitative data will be collected, other than suggestions for additional guideline items.
The explanatory document will provide detailed rationales and evidence for all of the guideline items and standards.
We assessed the REMARK reporting guideline items for patient characteristics, study design, data analysis and presentation of results, including the items in the REMARK profile.
Commonly unaddressed guideline items were related to imaging methodology, determination of precision from double examinations, and also mean error of rigid-body fitting and condition number cutoff levels.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com