Sentence examples for guidance for evaluating from inspiring English sources

Earlier MRC guidance for evaluating complex interventions focused on randomised trials, making no mention of process evaluation. 2 Updated guidance recognised the value of process evaluation within trials, stating that it "can be used to assess fidelity and quality of implementation, clarify causal mechanisms and identify contextual factors associated with variation in outcomes".

Despite amendments in 2007 and 2009, the FOIA process remains beset by incompetence and lack of guidance for evaluating requests.

This article presents guidance for evaluating harms when conducting and reporting CERs.

This brief overview summarizes publicly available guidance for evaluating materials compatibility with high-pressure gaseous hydrogen.

This method can provide an important guidance for evaluating the mechanical properties and selecting structural parameters for braided composites.

The good correlation between the experimental and simulated results shows that the used model may provide guidance for evaluating new materials by experimentalists.

Following the Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance 26 for evaluating complex interventions (in this case our nurse-led intervention), a pilot trial/feasibility study is essential for determining whether or not a large trial, which would definitively answer our research question, is feasible and warranted and, if so, to inform the design and sample size for such a trial.

Unlike occupational exposures, there has been virtually no research done to estimate ground-level personal exposures to SRM materials, though the US Environmental Protection Agency EPAA) does provide guidance on methods for evaluating environmental exposures to several possible SRM materials [ 22].

The AG shares this concern, and his memo outlines a set of principles for DOJ divisions to follow when issuing new guidance documents as well as procedures for evaluating existing guidance.

In such a simplified mode, the fifth digit could be used in further studies for evaluating guidance for treatment.

(Marais Dep. Tr. 87 2-89 23). Thus, Dr. Marais appropriately provides the jury with guidance concerning the technically important factors for evaluating Dr. Hakala's event study, rather than instructing the jury on what its opinion should be, as Defendants implicitly suggest he should have done.