Sentence Yes, this is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that someone (or something) guarantees that something is true. For example: "The professor guaranteed the truth of the student's claims."
Scientific journals cannot guarantee the truth of the reports they publish, but they do try to weed out obvious error by submitting manuscripts to expert reviewers.
Intuitively, what's required is that the conclusion "follow from" the premises, or that the truth of the premises "guarantee" the truth of the conclusion.
Although the premises in such arguments do not guarantee the truth of the conclusion, rules can nevertheless be given for default inferences, and a semantics can be developed for them.
This will permit us to demonstrate that certain arguments or inferences are good ones, in the sense that the truth of their assumptions or premises would guarantee the truth of their conclusions.
Whereas valid deductive inferences guarantee the truth of their conclusions, in the sense that it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false, good inductive inferences guarantee only that, if the premises are true, the conclusion is probable, or likely to be true.
What distinguishes them is that the existence of a fact is supposed to guarantee the truth of a truth-bearer.
It's judged to be the case that the form of the argument guarantees the truth of the conclusion.
It is the act of concealment, within intellectual structures of impenetrable opacity, which guarantees the truth of every revelation.
An argument is deductively valid when the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion; i.e., the conclusion must be true, because of the form of the argument, whenever the premises are true.
Deductive logic is the study of the structure of deductively valid arguments—i.e., those whose structure is such that the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion.
Whereas it turns out that what guarantees the truth of the conclusion, in that case, is nothing other than facts about the world, as opposed to facts about the structure of the argument.
