groups with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "groups with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to associations or collaborations involving multiple groups or entities. Example: "The organization often collaborates with various groups with similar goals to promote community development."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

They're creating smaller groups with these new services".

The Guardian - Tech

All are conservative Christian groups with sizable followings.

The New York Times

There are small production groups with no employers and employees.

The Guardian

Attendees divided into groups with each of the panelists.

The New Yorker

That has gone, and some of the groups with it.

The Guardian

We've got to do some focus groups with our fans.

The New York Times

Interest groups with heavy stakes embraced the proposal, but warily.

The New York Times - Health

These are very separate demographic groups with very diverse interests".

The New York Times

This brings together different cultural groups with all their baggage.

The New York Times

THE CROWD Quiet; couples and small groups, with few children.

The New York Times

Women huddled in groups with their panicked children.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "groups with", ensure that the characteristic or attribute following "with" is clearly defined and relevant to the context. For example, "groups with special needs children" is more precise than "groups with children."

Common error

Avoid using "groups with" followed by a vague or overly broad descriptor. Instead of saying "groups with problems", specify the nature of the problems, such as "groups with financial difficulties" or "groups with logistical challenges".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "groups with" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, often indicating a specific attribute or characteristic shared by the groups. Ludwig AI's analysis supports its use in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "groups with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase for specifying shared characteristics among collections of entities. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is versatile and applicable across various contexts, from scientific research to news reporting. To ensure clarity, always specify the attribute following "with". While alternatives exist, "groups with" is a succinct and direct way to describe collections possessing certain qualities.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

teams including

Replaces "groups" with "teams" to emphasize a competitive or collaborative unit and "with" by "including" to highlight the membership.

clusters comprising

Substitutes "groups" with "clusters" suggesting a collection of similar items and "with" by "comprising" to indicate that they form it.

organizations featuring

Replaces "groups" with "organizations" for a more formal tone and "with" by "featuring" to emphasize a characteristic.

associations incorporating

Swaps "groups" for "associations" implying a structured assembly, and changes "with" to "incorporating" focusing on the included elements.

collections containing

Uses "collections" instead of "groups" to denote a gathering, and "containing" in place of "with" to stress inclusion.

sets involving

Replaces "groups" with "sets" to indicate a mathematical or logical grouping, and "with" by "involving" to denote participation.

categories encompassing

Substitutes "groups" with "categories" indicating classification, and "with" by "encompassing" focusing on the scope of inclusion.

segments displaying

Replaces "groups" with "segments" suggesting a division, and "with" by "displaying" to highlight a characteristic.

divisions exhibiting

Uses "divisions" instead of "groups" to imply separation, and "exhibiting" in place of "with" to stress a demonstrated attribute.

sections presenting

Replaces "groups" with "sections" to indicate a part of a whole, and "with" by "presenting" to focus on what's shown.

FAQs

How can I use "groups with" in a sentence?

The phrase "groups with" is used to describe collections of entities that share a specific attribute or characteristic. For example, "We compared "groups with and without" the intervention to assess its effectiveness."

What are some alternatives to "groups with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "teams including", "clusters comprising", or "organizations featuring" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it always necessary to specify the attribute after "groups with"?

While not always mandatory, specifying the attribute after "groups with" provides clarity and precision to your writing. It helps the reader understand the distinguishing characteristic of the groups being discussed.

What's the difference between "groups with" and "groups that have"?

"Groups with" is a more concise and direct way of expressing that groups possess a certain attribute. "Groups that have" is grammatically correct but can sometimes sound more verbose. For example, "groups with special needs" is more succinct than "groups that have special needs".