Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Five groups were examined: 2 MGs, 2 ECGs and 1CG.
Differences between two groups were examined for statistical significance by the Student's t-test.
All 98 persons (patients and control groups) were examined by HRUS.
Differences in firm performance and GSCM dimensions among groups were examined.
Data for control (n = 37) and schizotypy (n = 39) groups were examined.
The effects of selected reaction parameters that can influence the distribution of sulfate groups were examined.
The viability of the MSCs in all three groups were examined by CCK-8 assay after 1, 4, and 7 days of incubation (Fig. 8).
Differences between groups were examined using Student's t-test, chi-square test and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test, two-way ANOVA.
Overall, four different subject groups were examined in this study.
The distribution of questions by numbers and types for all six groups were examined.
Differences between groups were examined using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
More suggestions(15)
forces were examined
groups were discussed
parties were examined
groups were explained
clusters were examined
groups were evaluated
teams were examined
groups were assessed
groups were determined
panels were examined
groups were explored
groups were investigated
population were examined
cluster were examined
series were examined
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com