Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(35)
An AMOVA using the five population clusters detected with the Bayesian analysis as the groupings, found that 18.9% of the variance was explained at the among groups level, and 77.9% at the within populations level.
In an AMOVA using the two genotypes, Amazonia and Central America, as the groupings, 20.1% of the total variance was explained at the between groups level and 70.1% within populations.
Mechanical changes were not caused by chemical changes at functional groups level but a rearrangement of polar/nonpolar components.
These analyses show systematic skill differences across gender, age groups, level of education, and migration background (OECD 2013a).
In the next step, the relative weights for each barrier groups (level 3) under each of the four criteria were obtained.
We will use four grouping variables when analyzing measurement invariance of the motivation-to-learn scale, namely gender, age groups, level of education, and migration background.
Similar(25)
But at the group level, it is true.
who are not, both at group level and individual level.
Next, we'll focus on the group level.
Big Data won't discriminate: does BD avoid group level prejudice?
There was no discernable intervention effect at the group level.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com