Exact(4)
Consistent with a role for collinearity in perceptual grouping, thresholds are lower for collinear displays.
Grouping thresholds of LOD 4.0 (L. goodei) and 3.5 (L. parva) were used and markers significantly out of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P < 0.001) were excluded.
SUVmax values were assessed as grouping thresholds for predictive value for overall survival (OS) using Student t test and the log-rank test, and p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
After stringent mapping and correction of suspicious data, the segregation data belonging to each wheat chromosome were pooled and re-analysed in Carthagene using less stringent grouping thresholds (rec freq = 0.3 LOD = 3).
Similar(56)
where λρ i denotes the grouping threshold value.
Linked loci were grouped with a LOD grouping threshold ranging from 3.0 to 5.0.
A loci grouping threshold of LOD≥8 was used with default locus ordering parameters.
Linkage groups were identified in the LOD (logarithm (base 10) of odds) grouping threshold range of 5.0 10.0, and linkage groups were assigned as C01 C09, corresponding to the C-genome linkage groups of B. napus[ 32].
Linked loci were grouped in the LOD grouping threshold range of 3.8-5.0, 3.8-5.0,and groups were assigned as A1 to A10, corresponding to the previouslinkagerted initial version map [ 16] of this species.
Linkage maps were constructed using all data available from markers (111 plants for T×E and 190 plants for T1E) with MapMaker/exp 3.0 with the Kosambi mapping function at a logarithm of odds (LOD) grouping threshold ≥3.0.
The group thresholds are visualized in Fig. 2c.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com