Exact(3)
The results showed grouping of sample replicates in tight clusters according to the juice source fruit (see Table 1).
Differences between seasons and the months of nymphal abundance observed by Randolph became nonsignificant when this grouping of sample periods was included in the same model (chi square=2.73, df=2, p>0.25).
When this grouping of sample periods was included, differences between years, seasons, and the periods observed by Randolph became nonsignificant l (chi square=4.13, df =3, p>0.2). aRodent ID was included in the models as a random effect.
Similar(57)
Some seasonal grouping of samples was still evident, as the three August samples were most similar to each other.
We only use the rough grouping of samples for later interpretation of the identified clusters.
However, the smaller HS set provided a tighter grouping of samples.
This is done by examining the variation within the whole groups of sample means.
The two groups of samples scattered randomly without forming separable clusters (Fig. 1) when we analysed the three cohorts.
One group of samples consisted of mats of carbon nanotubes sprayed on copper or silicon substrates.
Groups of samples composed of analogous food matrices showed consistent release rates.
Homogeneous porosity distribution was achieved in all the groups of samples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com