Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(16)
In all cases variance testing could not rule out the assumptions that grouped responses were normally distributed and had the same variances.
We grouped responses into three groups—"cost" (i.e. the respondent said the cost was too high); "access" (we used this summary term to group "facility closed," "too far," and "did not know where"); and "not necessary" (we used this summary term to group "not necessary," 'father did not think necessary," "'family did not think necessary," "husband/family did not allow," and "not customary").
We grouped responses into "good or better" self-reported health and "less than good".
We grouped responses into 3 categories (no binge drinking, < once per week, and ≥ once per week).
Therefore, we grouped responses 1) and 3) as intended pregnancy, and responses 2) and 4) as unintended pregnancy.
For the general health item (number 1 in Appendix A), we grouped responses into two categories: excellent, very good, or good health compared to fair or poor health.
Similar(44)
We compared responses between the four PICUs by grouping responses into SA/A, neutral, and D/SD.
Two experienced focus group facilitators/co-investigators, followed the discussion guide, attended to group responses, and allowed a spontaneous exchange of ideas (Brown 1999).
Provisional analysis occurred through grouping responses based on the question prompt.
Disordered thresholds can be observed and dealt with by grouping response categories.
After eight weeks, she compared the two groups' responses to questions about well-being.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com