grouped into

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "grouped into" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use this phrase when you need to indicate that two or more items have been placed into the same category. For example: "The tasks were grouped into low, medium, and high priority categories."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The clubs are grouped into national cartels.

The Economist

Like Hogwarts, students are grouped into Houses.

The New York Times

Music performances were grouped into two themes.

The New Yorker

Scores on the test were grouped into four levels.

The New York Times

Disability is grouped into three categories in Russia.

The Guardian

Scores on the statewide tests are grouped into four levels.

The New York Times

In Fluevog land, shoe styles are grouped into Families.

The New Yorker

These categories are grouped into eight dimensions.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

These services were grouped into three categories.

Procedia Engineering

These can be grouped into three categories.

Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Kebeles were grouped into two strata.

Pastoralism

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the characteristics of groups, ensure clarity by specifying the attributes that define each category. For example, "Participants were grouped into high, medium, and low engagement categories based on their activity levels."

Common error

Avoid vague descriptions when using "grouped into". Instead of saying "The items were grouped into categories", specify the criteria: "The items were grouped into categories based on size, color, and material."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "grouped into" functions as a verb phrase with a preposition, indicating the action of categorizing or combining items based on shared characteristics. As supported by Ludwig, this phrase is correct and commonly used in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

53%

News & Media

28%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "grouped into" is a common and grammatically correct verb phrase used to describe the act of categorizing items based on shared characteristics. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and frequent use across various contexts, including science and news media. While alternatives like "categorized into" and "classified into" exist, "grouped into" provides a clear and widely understood way to express categorization. When using this phrase, ensure clarity in defining the criteria for grouping to avoid vagueness. The consistent usage and authoritative sources support its reliability in English writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

clustered into

This alternative suggests a formation of groups based on similarity or proximity.

categorized into

Focuses on the act of sorting items into specific categories based on shared characteristics.

classified into

Emphasizes a formal or systematic assignment to different classes.

arranged into

Implies a structured or orderly formation of groups.

organized into

Suggests a purposeful structuring and arrangement of items.

divided into

Highlights the separation of a whole into distinct parts or groups.

separated into

Implies a clear distinction and segregation of items into groups.

sorted into

Focuses on the act of arranging items methodically into different groups.

sectioned into

Suggests dividing something into defined sections or parts.

compartmentalized into

Implies dividing something into distinct, often isolated, categories.

FAQs

How can I use "grouped into" in a sentence?

You can use "grouped into" to describe how items are categorized based on shared characteristics. For example, "The students were grouped into teams based on their skills."

What's a good alternative for "grouped into"?

Alternatives include "categorized into", "classified into", or "organized into", depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "grouped by" instead of "grouped into"?

"Grouped by" and "grouped into" serve different purposes. "Grouped by" is used to indicate the criteria for forming groups (e.g., "grouped by age"), while "grouped into" describes the resulting categories (e.g., "grouped into age ranges").

What's the difference between "grouped into" and "divided into"?

"Grouped into" suggests forming categories based on shared attributes, while "divided into" suggests separating a whole into distinct parts. For example, you might group students into reading levels but divide a cake into slices.