Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
At the level of Order cyt b grouped correctly 94.31% of 211 mammal species and COI gave a slightly lower percentage of 93.36%.
We speculate that the ECM change induced by PEO4 cells might be smaller than other cells presenting OVCAR10-like phenotypes; thereby, they might not be grouped correctly based on detection of fluorescent signal after prolonged culture.
COI was much less able to group members of the Euarchontoglires (63.0%) and Laurasiatheria (79.4%) together, whereas cyt b performed much better with 87.0% of Euarchontoglires and 100% of Laurasiatheria grouped correctly together, so that overall cyt b correctly placed more of the 217 mammal species in the correct Super Order than COI.
All viruses in these four genera are grouped correctly.
All viruses in the genera within each subfamily are grouped correctly in Figures 1 and 2c.
The clusters obtained from the MCPSC method show that most domains are grouped correctly according to their structural fold.
Similar(52)
However, as evident, multiple-knockouts annotation produces a superior clustering, e.g., grouping correctly the amino acids and the pyrimidines to separate categories, while the single-knockout clustering fails to do so.
If the reference isolates were not grouped together correctly, the run would be repeated.
And if you don't match the groups correctly, then the conclusions you reach will be entirely misdirected, and this is what I would suggest is happening in this research study.
When asked about what led to the lack of intergroup contact, each group correctly said that they themselves avoided contact because of their fears of rejection, but misattributed the other group's avoidance to lack of interest.
When asked about what led to the lack of intergroup contact, each group correctly said that they themselves avoided contact because of their fears of rejection, but incorrectly attributed the other group's avoidance to lack of interest.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com