Suggestions(2)
Exact(2)
The evolution processes of a population consist of three major operations: group reproduction using the compact genetic algorithm, variable two-part individual crossover, and variable two-part mutation.
Our results indicate that a skew in nymph production was positively correlated with relatedness of the individuals in female pairs; this supports one of the transactional models of reproductive skew (the concession model) in which a dominant individual controls the subordinate's fraction of total group reproduction [ 9].
Similar(58)
The effective post-vaccination group-to-group reproduction number is then given by, where s v is corresponding average number of carriage episodes under vaccination.
The group-to-group reproduction number R* (based on children only) calculated from posterior predictive simulations was 15.8, with a 90% posterior probability to be less than 25.
For a single pneumococcal serotype, the group-to-group reproduction number was estimated at 16, the individual-to-individual reproduction number at 1.4, and the critical vaccine efficacy against carriage at 0.3.
For any given serotype, the potential of within-group outbreaks to sustain transmission in the whole population is characterized by the average number of infectious contacts emanating from a single outbreak [ 21], the so called group-to-group reproduction number R*.
Within social groups, reproduction was density dependent.
However, in many groups reproduction is extremely skewed.
Based on this, we derive an estimate of the group-to-group basic reproduction number for a single serotype, describing the amplifying effect of within-group transmission.
But one dominant female in each group monopolizes reproduction, in part by killing the offspring of subordinate females Over 80% of surviving young are her own.
However, while in small groups the α-worker monopolized reproduction, in larger groups several workers shared reproduction, creating two worker groups: reproductives and helpers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com