Sentence examples for group prioritisation from inspiring English sources

Risk group prioritisation should take place on the basis of assessment of transmission and individual impact risk.

The three groups' prioritisations were combined and the final top 15 presented in a final round to the entire group.

Participants who nominated two or more ethnic groups were assigned to a single group using the prioritisation system recommended by Statistics New Zealand, with the order of priority being (from highest to lowest): Māori, Pacific, Asian, Other, New Zealand European [ 20].

Information on ethnicity was collected using the 2006 NZ Census of Populations and Dwellings question as recommended by Statistics NZ. 14 The participants who nominated two or more ethnic groups were assigned to a single group using the prioritisation system recommended by Statistics NZ, with the following order of priority (from highest to lowest): Māori, Pacific, Asian, Other and NZ European.

With the exception of 'weight gain', the ranking of negative appraisals was similar between the two treatment groups; suggesting similar prioritisation of concerns about insulin between groups and differing only by intensity of endorsement.

Where this was the case ethnicity data were categorised into a single ethnic group using a hierarchical prioritisation method that prioritised ethnicity in the following order: Māori, Pacific, Asian, Other, or NZ European [ 33].

The shortlisted questions were presented on one side of large cards; on the other side were the ranked positions from each stakeholder group from the interim prioritisation.

Table 4 lists the interest groups participating in the prioritisation processes of the reports Four of the eight studies with children as an identifiable group addressed limited areas of child health only i.e. mother to child transmission of HIV, school health, chronic diseases of childhood, and perinatal care [ 10- 13].

The added value of this nominal group study lies in the prioritisation by the experts of strategies to influence the implementation of quality improvement activities in palliative care.

Where there was disagreement about the level of priority, each card had the interim prioritisation for each group (PwP, carers, family and friends, and professionals) written on the back, and this information assisted decisions about rankings.

Guidance is given for the prioritisation of patient groups during shortage.