group of aggressors

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "group of aggressors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a collective of individuals or entities that are acting aggressively or hostile towards others. Example: "The investigation revealed a group of aggressors responsible for the recent attacks in the area."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

What's most perplexing to mob experts and may be the dead giveaway in revealing this phantom group of aggressors, is the lack of response from the Rizzuto clan.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

A small group of Maasai are the aggressors.

Vice

We presented a number of models, investigating how individual variation in social vigilance (monitoring or scanning) in the context of spatial avoidance of aggressors affect group-level properties (the socio-spatial structure).

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

The suffering of "aggressors"?

The New York Times - Arts

We first constructed a model of a group of primates, where individuals employ grouping behavior, dominance interactions and spatial avoidance of potential aggressors (cf. the avoidance model in Evers et al. 2011).

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

But despite Lavrov's statement, a group of ruling party lawmakers said on Tuesday they would introduce legislation to ban auditing and consulting companies from "aggressor countries", including the big four auditing firms Deloitte, KPMG, Ernst & Young and PricewaterhouseCoopers.

The Guardian

"These aggressors are disproportionately likely to self-identify as Donald Trump supporters, conservatives, or part of the 'alt-right,' a loosely connected group of extremists, some of whom are white supremacists," the A.D.L. reported.

The New Yorker

It's a ragtag group of the gifted, forlorn, stalwart, and mad, which roams the thinly populated wastes around the Great Lakes, performing plays and music, foraging for food, fighting off aggressors with crossbows.

Huffington Post

In this context of aggressor avoidance, in line with Chance (1967) we can distinguish between two different forms of social vigilance: First, an individual may selectively monitor a particular, potentially dangerous group member by remaining visually oriented towards this animal to keep track of its further actions.

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

In any wild habitat, groups of animals will respond to outside aggressors in one of two ways: they either circle up and work together for their collective survival, or they scatter and let the slow ones get picked off.

Huffington Post

This can cause serious problems for the correct identification of both aggressors and victims of bullying.

BMC Public Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "group of aggressors", ensure the context clearly defines who the aggressors are and what actions constitute their aggression.

Common error

Avoid using "group of aggressors" without providing sufficient context. Clearly identify who is initiating the aggressive actions to prevent misinterpretations and accusations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "group of aggressors" functions as a noun phrase. It identifies a collective entity characterized by aggressive behavior. As noted by Ludwig, it is a usable English phrase. It acts as the subject or object of a sentence, denoting the entity responsible for initiating aggression.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

36%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

6%

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "group of aggressors" is a grammatically sound way to describe a collective responsible for initiating hostile actions. While not overly frequent, as Ludwig AI points out, it finds utility across various contexts, including news reports, scientific studies, and general discussions. When employing this phrase, clarity is paramount; ensure the context clearly defines who the aggressors are and what actions they have committed. Alternatives such as "band of attackers" or "team of assailants" can be used to subtly shift the emphasis. Overall, "group of aggressors" serves as a functional and readily understandable term for identifying those who start conflicts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

band of attackers

Replaces "aggressors" with a more direct and action-oriented term, implying a planned attack.

team of assailants

Suggests a coordinated effort by a group of people who commit violent acts.

hostile faction

Implies a more organized and ideologically driven group with aggressive intent.

attacking party

Focuses on the act of aggression, portraying the group as the initiator of an attack.

belligerent force

Emphasizes the group's readiness and willingness to engage in conflict or war.

offensive unit

A more formal term, often used in military or strategic contexts, referring to a group designed for attack.

violent mob

Highlights the uncontrolled and destructive nature of the group's aggression.

army of invaders

Suggests a large-scale intrusion with hostile intentions.

troublemaking gang

Implies a smaller, less organized group causing disruption and conflict.

antagonistic coalition

A formal term indicating a group united by their opposition and hostility towards others.

FAQs

How can I use "group of aggressors" in a sentence?

You can use "group of aggressors" to describe a collective of individuals or entities that are acting aggressively or hostilely towards others. For example: "The investigation revealed a "group of aggressors" responsible for the recent attacks in the area."

What are some alternatives to "group of aggressors"?

Alternatives include "band of attackers", "team of assailants", or "hostile faction", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "aggressor group" instead of "group of aggressors"?

"Group of aggressors" is more common and natural-sounding. "Aggressor group" is grammatically correct but less frequently used.

What distinguishes a "group of aggressors" from a "group of defenders"?

A "group of aggressors" initiates hostile actions, while a "group of defenders" acts to protect themselves or others from harm. The key difference lies in who initiates the conflict.