Exact(5)
The variance-covariance matrix of the within group errors was diagonal with a variance function that was constant for the hypertensive and normotensive groups.
Supplementary Table 1 displays mean group errors (expressed as a proportion of go and no-go trials) and mean go RT for the first and final training session (completed with the researcher present) to illustrate task performance over time.
The variance-covariance matrix of the within group errors was diagonal with a variance function that was a power of the fitted values; the variance function coefficient (95 % CI) was estimated to be −1.740 −2.3000, −1.180).
The variance-covariance matrix of the within group errors was diagonal with a power variance function based on the fitted values; the variance function coefficient (95 % CI) was estimated to be −1.632 −2.2066, −1.058).
A similar pattern was seen for reference memory errors, with a sex difference in the control group (errors in males < females, p < 0.008) but not in the animals exposed to CPF.
Similar(55)
The center line indicates the mean value for the represented group; error bars indicate ±s.d.d
Data are representative of two independent experiments, n=4 6 per group; error bars are mean±s.e.m.m
Many empirical studies have found that software metrics can predict class error proneness and the prediction can be used to accurately group error-prone classes.
The mean group error for the 100 permutations was 0.36.
Task switching group error rate profiles revealed distinct cognitive flexibility deficiencies in the ADHD group.
In the case of the task switching paradigm, ADHD group error rates were also found to be generally elevated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com