grounds for rejection

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "grounds for rejection" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where reasons or justifications for rejecting something, such as an application or proposal, are being discussed. Example: "The committee provided clear grounds for rejection, citing insufficient evidence and lack of originality in the submission."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

If the consul believes the Mitchell report and thinks a player has engaged in trafficking, that's grounds for rejection and there's no appeal".

The New York Times - Sports

Ms. Robertson said that had she known a Caesarean was grounds for rejection, she would not have even applied to Golden Rule, because the denial may be held against her in the future.

The New York Times - Health

The journal apologised for the response, and also for an email to the authors that explained the grounds for rejection were "the qulaity [sic] of the manuscript is por [sic] issues on methodologies and presentation of resulst [sic]".

The Guardian - Opinion

Figure 4(c) shows the importance of the pTRM checks; if there were no checks during the paleointensity experiments, there would be no other grounds for rejection.

Earth, Planets and Space

Acidification and CO2release resulting from fermentative metabolism of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts were the principal grounds for rejection of ham pizza stored under 20% CO2(commercial conditions).

Food Microbiology

But the grounds for rejection spring from the very view of 'idea' Locke espouses; an idea is generated and formed by sensation and reflection.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

Federal, state and city law all create various categories (for example, race, age and gender) that are prohibited as grounds for a rejection.

The New York Times

Instead, Parfit argues that contractualists should permit both personal and impartial reasons as grounds for reasonable rejection.

SEP

There seem to be few grounds for the rejection of the Non-Avoidance Condition (f); it is undeniable that, at least in some cases, people seek out tragedy.

SEP

Rather, gratuitously causing suffering is always intrinsically wrong because it is (always and everywhere) the kind of thing that provides grounds for reasonable rejection.

SEP

Where labelling of GMO ingredients is mandatory (e.g. the EU for food/feed), the presence of GMO ingredients in unlabelled foodstuffs above a prescribed threshold (0.9% for the EU, EC [2003]) is also grounds for either rejection of imports or product withdrawal.

International Journal of Food Contamination

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "grounds for rejection", clearly state the specific reasons. Vague or unsubstantiated grounds can lead to disputes or misunderstandings.

Common error

Avoid stating the "grounds for rejection" too broadly. Instead of saying "the proposal lacked merit", specify the exact deficiencies, such as "the proposal lacked a clear methodology and sufficient supporting data".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "grounds for rejection" functions as a noun phrase, identifying the reasons or justifications that validate a decision to reject something. Ludwig shows it is used to explain why a proposal, application, or idea is not accepted.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "grounds for rejection" is a grammatically correct and usable term in English, denoting the reasons for not accepting something. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage spans across various contexts like news, science, and general discussions, often in neutral to formal registers. While alternatives like "reasons for dismissal" or "justifications for refusal" exist, the core meaning remains consistent: providing a valid basis for declining something. When employing the phrase, it's crucial to specify reasons clearly to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reasons for dismissal

Focuses on the reasons leading to a dismissal.

justifications for refusal

Emphasizes the justifications behind a refusal.

basis for disapproval

Highlights the foundation upon which disapproval is based.

reasons for non-acceptance

Specifically addresses why something isn't accepted.

cause for denial

Points to the cause that leads to a denial.

rationale for declining

Highlights the rationale behind the act of declining.

explanation for turning down

Focuses on the explanation provided for turning something down.

reason for declining

Emphasizes the reason one declines something.

justification for declining

Emphasizes the justification for declining something.

rationale for refusal

Highlights the reasoning behind a refusal.

FAQs

What does "grounds for rejection" mean?

The phrase "grounds for rejection" refers to the reasons or justifications for not accepting or approving something, such as an application, proposal, or idea.

How can I use "grounds for rejection" in a sentence?

You can use it to explain why something was not accepted. For example, "Insufficient data was the primary "reason for rejection"." or "The committee outlined the "basis for disapproval" in their report."

What are some alternatives to "grounds for rejection"?

Alternatives include "reasons for dismissal", "justifications for refusal", and "basis for disapproval", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use "grounds for rejection" or "reasons for rejection"?

Both are correct, but "grounds for rejection" often implies a more formal or official context, while "reasons for rejection" is more general. The best choice depends on the situation and the desired tone.