grounds for in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "grounds for in" is not correct and does not make sense in written English.
It seems to be an incomplete expression and lacks context to determine its intended meaning. Example: "The committee found no grounds for inaction regarding the proposal."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Strong grounds for in".

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

The property developer bought the 17th-century house, which has landscaping by Humphry Repton and a Doric temple in the grounds, for £26m in 2006.

The Guardian

What do you suggest on the ground for in between raised garden beds?

The New York Times

This, then, was the nature of Jones's training ground for In Parenthesis; the carving tool, the paintbrush and the canvas, not the pen or the typewriter.

The Guardian - Books

But there is certainly a middle ground, for in order for something to even qualify as satire it has to be scathingly accurate.

Huffington Post

"Poor performance is rarely grounds for dismissal in Nigeria.

The Economist

But there are some grounds for concern in politics.

The Economist

Fingerless sleeve-gloves are grounds for divorce in my book.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

But there are grounds for optimism in 2014.

The Guardian - Business

But the creative success of these new productions provides grounds for optimism in British opera too.

The Economist

There are some grounds for hope in the latest City Ballet creations.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "grounds for in" as it is grammatically incorrect and lacks a clear meaning. Instead, use established phrases like "grounds for optimism in" or rephrase your sentence for clarity.

Common error

Do not directly follow "grounds for" with "in". This creates a grammatically incomplete phrase. Use a noun or gerund between "grounds for" and a prepositional phrase, like in "grounds for concern in politics."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "grounds for in" is grammatically incomplete. While "grounds for" typically indicates a reason or justification, the addition of "in" without a connecting noun phrase creates an incoherent structure. As noted by Ludwig AI, the phrase needs additional context to convey a clear meaning.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "grounds for in" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and lacks a clear, established meaning in English. Ludwig AI identifies it as such, recommending alternative phrases to convey the intended meaning. While examples exist in News & Media and Scientific sources, they often appear as part of larger, correct phrases. It is best to avoid using "grounds for in" and instead opt for more grammatically sound alternatives like "reasons for including" or "grounds for optimism in", depending on the context, or use alternative valid phrases like "basis for including".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reasons for including

Replaces "grounds" with "reasons", focusing on the justification for inclusion.

basis for incorporating

Uses "basis" instead of "grounds", emphasizing the foundation or rationale for incorporating something.

justification for within

Substitutes "grounds" with "justification", highlighting the reasons for something being inside a particular area or context.

rationale for using in

Employs "rationale" to indicate the reasoning behind using something within a specific context.

cause for involving in

Focuses on the reason or cause for involving something or someone in a particular situation.

motivation for integrating into

Highlights the driving force or motivation behind integrating something into a larger system or context.

explanation for placing in

Replaces "grounds" with "explanation", emphasizing the reasons for placing something in a certain location or context.

justification for applying in

Focuses on the reasons for applying a particular method or technique within a specific context.

excuse for adding in

Uses "excuse" to indicate a reason, possibly weaker, for adding something into a particular situation.

grounds for optimism in

This retains some of the original phrase's wording, but provides a full and proper phrase.

FAQs

What are some correct ways to use "grounds for" in a sentence?

You can use "grounds for" followed by a noun, such as "grounds for dismissal", "grounds for optimism", or "grounds for concern". Ensure the phrase makes grammatical sense within the larger sentence.

What can I say instead of the incorrect phrase "grounds for in"?

Instead of "grounds for in", consider using phrases like "reasons for including", "basis for incorporating", or "justification for within", depending on the context.

Is "grounds for in" grammatically correct?

No, "grounds for in" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It is an incomplete phrase that requires additional words to form a coherent meaning.

How can I avoid making mistakes with phrases that start with "grounds for"?

Always ensure that "grounds for" is followed by a noun or noun phrase that logically connects to the rest of the sentence. For example, use "grounds for appeal" instead of a fragmented construction.