Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "grounds for believing" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to indicate the reasons or evidence that support a belief or conclusion. Example: The witness's testimony provided strong grounds for believing that the defendant was innocent.
Exact(60)
"There are strong grounds for believing Mr Mahmood told me lies," Judge McCreath told the jury.
But there are good grounds for believing that some of the fall in efficiency is real.
Now, back on familiar territory, he has grounds for believing that it will.
But the president's grounds for believing it moral were much less clear.
We have very strong grounds for believing these are Israeli intelligence agents".
Neither offers propitious grounds for believing that an enduring democracy is around the corner.
There are grounds for believing that David Guterson's popular 1994 novel, "Snow Falling on Cedars," could make good theater.
"There are reasonable grounds for believing that there will be the same outcome in the case of Morrison".
Yet there are no grounds for believing that Obama will dramatically alter how the US sees the world.
Brokers are governed by the "suitability rule," which requires them to have "reasonable grounds for believing that the recommendation is suitable," according to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
But there are grounds for believing that the latest deal, reached after eight days of haggling at Königswinter near Bonn, may be more than just another false dawn.
More suggestions(17)
grounds for assuming
grounds for giving
grounds for supposing
arguments for believing
grounds for understanding
grounds for viewing
grounds for knowing
grounds for hoping
reasons for believing
grounds for fearing
grounds for expecting
grounds for recognizing
grounds for thinking
grounds for establishing
grounds for betting
grounds for arguing
grounds for claiming
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com