grounds for adjudication

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "grounds for adjudication" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts to refer to the basis or reasons for a legal decision or judgment. Example: "The court found sufficient grounds for adjudication in the case presented by the plaintiff."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Standard issues concern conflicts of interest, grounds for adjudication, and criteria of fairness.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The Supreme Court dismissed the case on technical grounds, holding that the case was not ripe for adjudication.

Wikipedia

Alleging that the Municipal Court was threatening to proceed with a third trial on the same charges, they set forth grounds held sufficient under the state procedure to present for adjudication the question of the Municipal Court's jurisdiction.

Cornell University

In theory of adjudication, by contrast, the Normative Naturalist wants to identify norms for adjudication that will help judges realize adjudicative goals.

SEP

Submit questions for adjudication to www.maximumfun.org/jjho.org/jjho

The New York Times

To whom should we apply for adjudication on this?

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Submit questions for adjudication at maximumfun.org/jjho.org/jjho

The New York Times

First, she appeared skeptical about whether the case is ripe for adjudication.

The New York Times

Specimens yielding discordant results (n = 19) were tested at two outside laboratories for adjudication.

Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

The girls forwarded the correspondence to the Department of the Interior and asked for adjudication.

The Guardian

Listen to the podcast and submit questions for adjudication to www.maximumfun.org/jjho.org/jjho

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "grounds for adjudication", ensure the context clearly indicates a legal or formal decision-making process. For clarity, specify whose grounds are being referred to, such as "the court's grounds for adjudication".

Common error

Avoid using "grounds for adjudication" in contexts where the specific jurisdiction or decision-making body is unclear. Always provide enough context to clarify which legal system or authority is making the adjudication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "grounds for adjudication" functions as a noun phrase, identifying the reasons or basis upon which a decision can be made in a legal or formal context. As Ludwig AI points out, it correctly refers to the underlying rationale for legal proceedings.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Academia

33%

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "grounds for adjudication" is a grammatically sound phrase used to describe the reasons or basis for making a legal or formal judgment. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in formal English writing. While it's not exceedingly common, it appears most frequently in academic, news, and scientific contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the jurisdiction or decision-making body involved. Consider alternatives like "basis for ruling" or "reasons for judgment" to add variety to your writing. By understanding these nuances, you can effectively and accurately use "grounds for adjudication" in your legal and academic discourse.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

basis for ruling

Replaces "grounds" with "basis", maintaining the core meaning but using a slightly different term for foundation.

reasons for judgment

Substitutes "grounds" with "reasons", emphasizing the rationale behind the judicial decision.

justification for determination

Replaces both "grounds" and "adjudication" with synonyms, altering the phrasing while preserving the essential meaning.

rationale for the verdict

Focuses on the reasoning behind the final verdict, making it suitable when discussing the outcome of a case.

legal basis for the decision

Emphasizes the legal foundation of the decision-making process.

cause for legal proceedings

Shifts the focus to the initiation of legal proceedings based on specific causes.

just cause for judicial review

Highlights the justification for a review by a judicial body.

sufficient reason for legal action

Indicates that there's adequate justification to pursue legal action.

valid grounds for legal determination

Stresses the validity of the grounds upon which a legal decision is made.

underlying principles for the ruling

Refers to the foundational principles that guide the ruling.

FAQs

How is "grounds for adjudication" typically used in legal contexts?

In legal settings, "grounds for adjudication" refers to the sufficient reasons or evidence presented that allow a court or tribunal to make a formal judgment or ruling. It's the basis upon which a case is deemed suitable for resolution through legal proceedings.

What are some alternatives to "grounds for adjudication"?

You can use alternatives such as "basis for ruling", "reasons for judgment", or "justification for determination" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

In what situations might a case lack "grounds for adjudication"?

A case might lack "grounds for adjudication" if there is insufficient evidence, no legal basis for the claim, or if the matter is not yet ripe for a decision (e.g., the issue is hypothetical or premature).

What's the difference between "grounds for adjudication" and "grounds for appeal"?

"Grounds for adjudication" refer to the reasons a case is initially considered suitable for a legal decision, while "grounds for appeal" are the reasons why a previous decision should be reviewed by a higher court. One relates to the initial decision-making, and the other to challenging that decision.