Sentence examples for grounding statements from inspiring English sources

Assuming that grounding is unitary (we can remain neutral on how grounding might be related to metaphysical relations like material constitution and realization), what is the logical form of grounding statements?

It seems that there are cases in which a single fact is grounded in a plurality of facts (e.g., $[p \mathbin q]$ (the fact that $p \mathbin q$) is grounded in $[p], [q]$), so we can think of the logical form of grounding statements on the predicate view as follows: $[p]$ is grounded in Δ, where Δ is a plurality of facts.

For the purposes of this entry we will assume that grounding is a relation between facts, that the logical form of grounding statements is $[p]$ is grounded in Δ, and that $[p]$ is grounded in Δ only if $[p]$ and the Δs obtain (i.e., the grounding relation is factive).

We begin by addressing five foundational issues about grounding: (i) whether grounding is unitary, (ii) whether we can analyze the concept of grounding, (iii) the logical form of grounding statements, (iv) how grounding is related to explanation, and (v) how it's related to necessity.

The Manual of Reason says of time that it is the ground for statements about the past, present and future, that it is unique, eternal and ubiquitous, and that it is the container of everything and a instrumental cause of every effect (TS15+D).

He says lawyers are already likely to be on the ground, taking statements, because the losing party needs to be armed with a full statement of evidence when it files a challenge.

In place of the exclusive reliance on the hypothetical-deductive method these theorists employ non-demonstrative analogical and causal inductive reasoning to ground theoretical statements empirically.

Similarly, Gillies objects to single-case propensities on the grounds that statements about them are untestable, and that they are "metaphysical rather than scientific" (825).

This is usually understood as implying that the argument was grounded on statements (I) and (II), and had (IV), which is the contradictory of (III), as conclusion; and this is about as far as the passages lead us.

All researchers independently read samples of the documents and thereafter discussed and agreed on an initial coding scheme, which included the nonconformity statement, observations grounding the nonconformity statement, inspecting organization's follow-up process, measures initiated to correct nonconformity, and finalization of inspection.

The damage did not affect troops on the ground, the statement said.