Sentence examples for grounded inferences from inspiring English sources

Furthermore, it underscores that it is imperative to accommodate scaling when making phylogenetically grounded inferences about evolutionary changes in growth physiology through osseous histology [7].

Associations are determined using a statistically grounded approach to inference.

As explained in Section 1, the proposed tracking method is grounded on a Bayesian inference framework.

Later on, Philip Frank advocated the empirical historical studies of science as part of the more complete answer to the question of the choice of hypotheses raised by Duhem and Poincaré, and the insufficiency of the logical inference that grounded their conventionalism.

First, active inference is grounded in predictive coding, and therefore holds that descending signals are predictions of the sensory consequences of movement.

He wrote a treatise on the theory of signs: because they are empiricists, believing that all knowledge comes from our sense experience, later Epicureans were concerned about the basis for our knowledge of imperceptibles like the atoms, and engaged in an extensive debate with the Stoics about the grounds for inferences to imperceptible entities.

… Interpretive ethnography requires inference, even speculation, but these inferences and speculations must be grounded in observation and inquiry, in depth, in situations … where we have become familiar figures and can be treated casually by our informants" ([ 7]. p. xii).

The use of highly informative but biologically grounded priors is necessary for making inferences on high-dimensional data and can help identify developmental mechanisms underlying phenotypic variation in populations.

The current use of behavioral modernity in cognitive archaeology is grounded in a series of arbitrary categories and unwarranted inferences.

LEONARD uses event definitions that are grounded in force-dynamic primitives making robust and efficient force-dynamic inference critical to good performance.

Norton claims that any thought experiment is really a (possibly disguised) argument; it starts with premises grounded in experience and follows deductive or inductive rules of inference in arriving at its conclusion.