Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
ground proof
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "ground proof" is not commonly recognized as correct or usable in written English.
It may be intended to refer to verifying or validating something on the ground, but it lacks clarity without context. Example: "Before we proceed with the project, we need to ground proof the data collected from the site."
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
When the final whistle went, the Ahed players stood in the centre of the pitch, awaiting the inevitable news, their morose fug only broken by the growing celebratory moped horns blaring outside the ground: proof that Nejmeh were champions.
News & Media
We have also checked the convergence using standard deviation of the tracking error under different conditions (ground proof and noisy) with variable motion types (fast, medium, and slow).
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
Moreover, the acreage elasticity estimates can serve as a ground proofing and robustness check for other studies that estimate worldwide aggregate acreage elasticities (e.g., Haile et al. 2014).
In addition to studying MLT region atmospheric dynamics, they also provided the means and motivation for the intercomparison of MLT winds derived from different techniques for the purposes of ground proofing the satellite measurements (e.g., Palo et al. 1997), and provided a better understanding of the limitations of the various measurement techniques.
The average percentage durations of tracking correctness for particle filter are 34.50 for ground-proof, 33.35 for human target-only, and 35.83 for noisy-environment.
The average percentage durations of tracking correctness for CMKF are 45.50 for ground-proof, 34.61 for human target-only, and 40.75 for noisy-environment.
Figure 9 The comparison of percentage duration of tracking correctness for different data conditions: (a) Ground-proof, (b) Human target-only, and (c) Noisy-environment with multiple speed trials of target movement.
We summarize the mean error, the standard deviation of error, and mean time required per cycle in Table 3. Figure 9 shows the comparison of percentage duration of tracking correctness including ground-proof, human target-only, and noisy-environment with multiple speed trials of target movement.
Objective proofs are assumed to be explanatory and Bolzano calls them grounding proofs [Begründungen].
Science
The paper describes the development of a measurement system used to perform ground anchor proof testing.
Science
"Justin never figured out how to campaign in the post-Obama world," said the progressive leader who has worked with MoveOn, saying Ruben drove the organization "into the ground". "The proof is in the pudding.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "ground proof", ensure the context clearly indicates that you are referring to validating or verifying information in a real-world or practical setting. Consider using alternative phrases for clarity.
Common error
Avoid using "ground proof" in contexts where the meaning isn't immediately clear. Readers may misinterpret it or find it unconventional. Consider replacing it with a more common and unambiguous phrase like "validate on-site."
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "ground proof" functions as a verb phrase suggesting the act of validating or verifying something within a practical or real-world environment. According to Ludwig's analysis, it's not a commonly recognized phrase. It often implies a hands-on approach to confirming data or results.
Frequent in
Science
50%
News & Media
50%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "ground proof" is a rare phrase used to describe validating something in a real-world or practical setting. While not grammatically incorrect, Ludwig AI suggests that it's not commonly recognized and might require clarification. The sources where the term appears include science and news media. For greater clarity, consider alternatives such as "on-site validation" or "verify in the field". Ensure the context supports the meaning and usage when employing this phrase.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
validate on-site
Focuses on the action of validation happening at a specific location.
verify in the field
Emphasizes the verification process being carried out in a practical environment.
on-site validation
Replaces 'ground' with 'on-site', focusing on the location of validation.
in-field verification
Uses 'in-field' instead of 'ground', emphasizing practical verification.
practical validation
Emphasizes the practical aspect of the validation process.
empirical verification
Replaces "ground" with a more formal, scientific term.
real-world validation
Highlights the validation occurring in a real-world setting.
confirm through testing
Specifies 'testing' as the method of confirmation.
demonstrate empirically
Uses more formal language for showing proof through evidence.
establish with evidence
Focuses on the action of establishing something using evidence.
FAQs
What does "ground proof" mean?
"Ground proof" typically suggests verifying or validating something in a practical, real-world setting. However, it's not a commonly used phrase and might require clarification. Consider alternatives like "on-site validation" or "in-field verification".
How can I use "ground proof" in a sentence?
While "ground proof" can be used to describe validating something in a real-world scenario, it is uncommon. For example: "We need to "ground proof" our data before proceeding." However, using alternatives may enhance clarity.
What are some alternatives to "ground proof"?
Alternatives to "ground proof" include "on-site validation", "verify in the field", or "practical validation". The best choice depends on the specific context.
Is "ground proof" formal or informal?
"Ground proof" is neither particularly formal nor informal, but it is uncommon. In most contexts, using a more standard phrase will improve clarity. For scientific or technical contexts, consider "empirical verification".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested