ground on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "ground on" is not correct and does not have a clear meaning in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey a sense of being based on or relying upon something, but it is not a recognized expression. Example: "The decision was not grounded on solid evidence."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"She fell on the ground on one knee".

The New York Times

The tornado ground on.

The New York Times

Instead, his case ground on.

The New Yorker

But it has given ground on others.

The Economist

Builders have broken ground on new projects.

The New York Times

The slow car ground on, very slow.

The New Yorker

Flat ground on the green is rare.

The New York Times

Nevertheless, his case ground on.

The New York Times

Europe's jobless crisis ground on.

The Guardian - Business

Yet the war has ground on.

The Guardian

He is still on shaky ground on foreign policy.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Contextualize the phrase "ground on" with sufficient surrounding information to ensure the reader understands the intended meaning.

Common error

Avoid using "ground on" when a more precise term like "based on" or "dependent on" would improve clarity. Ambiguous phrasing can lead to misinterpretation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "ground on" functions as a prepositional phrase, often attempting to describe the basis or foundation for something. However, Ludwig AI indicates it is not always grammatically correct and may lack clarity in comparison to alternatives.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Academia

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "ground on" appears frequently in diverse contexts, especially in news and media, it is often considered grammatically questionable. Ludwig AI analysis suggests that alternatives like "based on" or "founded on" offer enhanced clarity and precision. Its varied usage across different sources contributes to an ambiguous register, making it crucial to ensure clear contextualization. When precision is required, especially in formal or scientific writing, resorting to alternative phrases is advisable.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

based on

Emphasizes a foundation or reason for something.

founded on

Similar to "based on", highlighting a solid foundation.

predicated on

Suggests a necessary condition or assumption.

contingent on

Indicates dependence on a specific condition.

dependent on

Highlights reliance on something else.

built upon

Focuses on progressive development from a base.

stemming from

Implies origin or causation.

arising from

Similar to "stemming from", suggesting emergence.

deriving from

Highlights the source or origin of something.

hinging on

Suggests that everything depends on a crucial point.

FAQs

How can I use the phrase "ground on" in a sentence?

While "ground on" can be used, it's often clearer to use phrases like "based on" or "founded on" to indicate a foundation or reason. For example, instead of saying 'The decision was ground on assumptions', say 'The decision was "based on" assumptions'.

What can I say instead of "ground on"?

You can use alternatives like ""based on"", "founded on", or "predicated on" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "ground on" or "based on"?

"Based on" is generally considered more grammatically correct and clearer than "ground on", especially in formal writing. "Ground on" can sometimes be ambiguous.

What's the difference between "ground on" and "founded on"?

Both phrases imply a basis or reason, but "founded on" suggests a more established or solid foundation, while "ground on" can sometimes lack precision. It is safer to use founded on in formal settings.