Sentence examples for ground assessment from inspiring English sources

The maximum and minimum hardness and moisture values across the nine locations for each ground assessment were also identified and used in the analyses to assess if difference in agreement existed with the extremes compared to the average values.

Details of how the grounds were sampled for this ground assessment sub-study have also been published (Twomey et al. [2012a]).

All PDCs received formal training on how to undertake the ground assessment (i.e. recommended pathway for the assessment), how to record the data and were instructed to complete the assessment approximately 20 min before the game started to avoid collisions with the players warming-up.

Even though a subjective ground assessment is generally based on the average condition of the whole ground, this study also investigated whether the level of agreement was stronger with extremes of objective measures such as the maximum or minimum hardness values of each ground.

This is the first study to compare subjective and objective ground assessments, and the findings suggest that the ability to accurately rate ground hardness and moisture level subjectively may be difficult.

If subjective ground assessments are to be used in future epidemiological studies which aim to establish an association with injury risk, there is a need to standardise practices and to ensure that the reliability of assessors and details of the assessed locations are stated.

While the use of objective measures is the most ideal option, where it is not possible, some standardisation of subjective category labels in future sports injury epidemiology studies will help to improve the accuracy of results provided by subjective ground assessments and lead to greater confidence in using the injury risk results to inform injury prevention strategies.

UNICEF sent teams from the community-based organization to conduct ground assessments through focus group discussions in various affected villages.

UNICEF sent teams from the community-based organisation to conduct ground assessments through focus group discussions in various affected villages.

These results highlight how visitor data can be used to identify priority areas for on-ground assessment of impacts in key locations.

This is not just a group of learned political scientists, however, and Diamond does not hesitate to follow a sophisticated piece of analysis with a hard-nosed, view-from-the-ground assessment.