ground arguments in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "ground arguments in" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that arguments are based on or supported by specific evidence, principles, or theories. Example: "In her essay, she grounds her arguments in extensive research and empirical data to strengthen her claims."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The Common Core demands students ground arguments in intelligence rather than intuition, objectivity rather than subjectivity, texts rather than feelings.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

As a scholar and savvy church politician, Francis grounds his arguments in theological precedent, including the words of earlier popes.

The New York Times - Books

As a philosopher, Manne grounds her arguments in more technical literature, and at one point she emphasizes the connection between her position and the Oxford philosopher P. F.

The New Yorker

Calling for a new "revolution of the mind", the RSA is grounding its arguments in empirical studies from neuroscience and psychology.

The Guardian - Opinion

Historically, people who were originally left out of the Constitution or who have wanted to make constitutional arguments about things not originally in the Constitution have most often grounded their arguments in the Bill of Rights.

The New Yorker

Grounding his arguments in extensive theory and policy analysis, Betts takes a comprehensive and realistic look at how knowledge and power can work together to face the intelligence challenges of the twenty-first century.

Columbia University

They believed the "leave it in the ground" argument was doomed to fail, and the best way to oppose the pipeline would be to propose an ineffective alternative which could be easily defeated.

Wikipedia

Most important are the things that come up before even a dime is spent, issues of communication setting "the ground rules," keeping arguments in check, and clearly defining roles, as Mashable pointed out in this helpful piece about starting a business with a friend "without ripping each others' throats out".

Vice

After grounding our argument in a discussion of stochastic noise and nongenetic heterogeneity, we explore the hypothesis that distinct chromatin domains, which are known to be dysregulated in disease and remodeled during development, might underlie cellular plasticity more generally.

Cell

As he acknowledges, he could have grounded his argument in morality: it is simply unfair that the richest 1 percent of Americans capture almost a quarter of the total income in the economy.

The New York Times - Books

Ms. Eltahawy, like most critics arguing that the Arab Spring is bad for women, grounds her argument in examples from Egypt.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "ground arguments in", ensure that the connection between the argument and its foundation is clear and explicit. This strengthens the persuasiveness and credibility of your reasoning.

Common error

Avoid using "ground arguments in" when the connection is weak or tenuous. Overstating the basis of your argument can weaken your overall case.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "ground arguments in" functions as a verb phrase, indicating the action of providing a solid basis or foundation for arguments. It emphasizes that the arguments are not arbitrary but are based on specific evidence, principles, or theories. Ludwig AI confirms its usability.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "ground arguments in" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression used to indicate that arguments are firmly based on evidence, principles, or theories. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. It is commonly found in news, scientific, and academic contexts, signaling a reasoned and well-supported approach. Alternatives include "base arguments on" and ""anchor arguments in"". When using this phrase, ensure that the connection between the argument and its foundation is clear to enhance persuasiveness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

base arguments on

Focuses on using something as a foundation or starting point for an argument. Less emphasis on providing a justification.

anchor arguments in

Suggests a strong and secure connection between the argument and its supporting evidence, conveying stability and reliability.

found arguments on

Similar to "base", but emphasizes the establishment of an argument upon a particular principle or fact.

situate arguments within

Highlights the context in which the arguments are placed, emphasizing the importance of understanding the surrounding circumstances.

root arguments in

Emphasizes the deep origins or fundamental nature of the arguments, suggesting a more profound and inherent connection.

derive arguments from

Focuses on the process of extracting or obtaining the arguments from a specific source or set of principles.

predicate arguments on

A more formal way of saying "base arguments on", often used in philosophical or academic contexts.

rest arguments upon

Indicates that the arguments rely heavily on a particular foundation, implying that their validity depends on it.

justify arguments with

Highlights the act of providing evidence or reasons to support and defend the arguments.

substantiate arguments through

Emphasizes the use of evidence or proof to strengthen and validate the arguments.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "ground arguments in" in academic writing?

In academic writing, "ground arguments in" is best used to show a clear connection between your claims and the evidence, theories, or principles that support them. For example, "The study "grounds its conclusions in" extensive empirical data."

What are some alternatives to "ground arguments in" for less formal contexts?

In less formal contexts, you can use alternatives such as "base arguments on", or "derive arguments from" to convey a similar meaning without sounding overly academic.

Is it correct to say "grounded arguments on" instead of "ground arguments in"?

While "grounded arguments" can be used as an adjective, the phrasing "grounded arguments on" is less common and can sound awkward. It's generally better to use "base arguments on" or "ground arguments in" for clarity.

How does "ground arguments in" differ from simply stating evidence?

"Ground arguments in" implies a more deliberate and foundational relationship. It suggests that the evidence is not just supportive but essential to the argument's structure and validity, as opposed to simply providing supporting details. It is very similar to "anchor arguments in".