Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(12)
Open image in new window Fig. 5 Gross calorific values of the briquetted samples.
Gross calorific values of selected common fuels are listed in Table 1.
Lower ash content was observed in briquette samples that have higher gross calorific values.
The gross calorific values (GCV) were also determined in Bomb calorimeter (Model: Leco, USA) by using standard methods (ASTM 2013).
Results showed that gross calorific values were comparable for the two fuel types in the range of 4663 6517 kcal/kg.
Gross calorific values and cetane numbers were obtained from bomb calorimeter (Model: LECO, AC 350, UK) and portable MID/NIR-FTIR spectrometer (Model: ERASPEC: eralytics GmbH, Austria), respectively.
Similar(48)
An increase in binder level reduces the gross calorific value.
This also contributes to the reduction in gross calorific value.
Thus, ash content suppresses the gross calorific value of briquettes.
Raw tomato pomace had the highest gross calorific value because of its high carbon content.
The moisture content, density and gross calorific value of the selected species were determined in triplicate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com