Exact(1)
Data extraction grid consensus.
Similar(59)
The challenge of fixing the grid requires greater consensus over the course of deregulation, a new grid architecture, and new regional institutions that allow for political accommodation without sacrificing a shared interest in affordable, reliable, and sustainable energy services.
Consensus grid analysis showed >99% of SG values within A/B zones, and 0% in D/E zones.
The coders each created an initial coding grid, then by consensus collapsed or deleted redundant codes to create a final thematic scheme.
These data were entered on a grid and a consensus was arrived at by all members of the team after extensive discussion.
Results: The accuracy of the results was demonstrated against capillary BG reference values, with 86.7% of sensor results within Consensus Error Grid Zone A. The percentage of readings within Consensus Error Grid Zone A on Days 2, 7, and 14 was 88.4%, 89.2%, and 85.2%, respectively.
The data were then structured into categories and put into a grid before identifying patterns, consensus, variation, contradiction and associations between variables [15].
We illustrate these shape changes (in Figure 5D) as thin plate spline grid deformations of the consensus configuration (where PC1 and PC2 both equal 0) superimposed on a rectangular grid, in the style made famous by D'arcy Thompson [32].
Furthermore, in contrast to the previous guidelines, the new standards also stipulate the inclusion of the Parkes (Consensus) error grid, a tool utilised for determining the clinical significance of the accuracy of the BG meter [ 20, 21].
As stated in the DIN EN ISO 15197:2013 guidelines (ISO 15197:2013, 2013), the clinical significance resulting from any inaccurate measurements made by the GlucoRx TD-4280 BG meter was determined using the Parkes (Consensus) error grid [ 20].
The percentage of readings within Consensus Error Grid Zone A (BG reference) on Days 2, 7, and 14 was 88.4%, 89.2%, and 85.2%, respectively (Fig. 3), and the MARD on the same days was 11.9%, 10.9%, and 10.8%, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com