Exact(2)
The notably greater yield obtained by heating native copper with associated oxide minerals may have led to the smelting process, since these oxides are easily reduced to metal in a charcoal bed at temperatures in excess of 700 °C (1,300 °F), as the reductant, carbon monoxide, becomes increasingly stable.
The notably greater yield obtained by heating native copper with associated oxide minerals may have led to the smelting process, since these oxides are easily reduced to metal in a charcoal bed at temperatures in excess of 700° C (1,300° F), as the reductant, carbon monoxide, becomes increasingly stable.
Similar(58)
The H2 yield of 1.92 mol hydrogen mol−1 hexose equivalentadded obtained in the co-culture was 32%% greater than the H2 yield obtained by the mono-culture of 1.45 mol hydrogen mol−1 hexose equivalentadded.
Also, the H2 yield of 2.05 mol hydrogen mol−1 hexose equivalentconsumed in the co-culture was 14%% greater than the H2 yield obtained by the mono-culture of 1.8 mol hydrogen mol−1 hexose equivalentconsumed.
There was a greater difference between the yield obtained following pretreatment with no catalyst and that obtained with 0.2% sulphuric acid, since the yield without catalyst was lower than that obtained from washed material.
The DNA yield obtained by S method (ranged 62 3599 ng/µl) was greater than the DNA yield obtained by other five methods.
When compared, the increase level in yield obtained when a fusion tag was used seems to be greater than that derived from codon optimization (Table 1).
In contrast, at a similar temperature (80 °C) using a different solvent system (70 30), greater yields were obtained.
In addition, a practical hydrogen production system would require that greater yields be obtained from the substrate, which could be brought about in several different ways.
Therefore, we believe that the great number of samples analysed in previous studies is the main factor for the relative low yield obtained.
In our study, the DNA yield obtained from BP1 method is ranged 49 1747.95 ng/µl and A260/280 ratios for all specimens were greater than 1.8.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com