Exact(60)
Fig. 3 Amplitude of the annual gravity change versus the background seismicity rate (by QN method).
By this assumption, fluid pressure decreases, and we could explain the observed negative gravity change.
The ratio of gravity change to vertical deformation is also shown.
The vertical axes denote relative gravity change in μGal and offsets are added for visualization.
(b) Gravity change expected for the model shown in Fig. 7 and Table 4.
In other terms, we do not observe any gravity change that exceeds our measurement precision.
Note that 1 μGal equals 1 × 10−8 m s−2 in gravity change.
The annual variation corresponds to a gravity change of ±1 μGal.
Fig. 7 Distribution of x2 (Eq. (3)) in the inverse analysis of the gravity change rates.
Table 1 shows the results for the amplitude of the annual gravity change.
Figure 6(a) shows the gravity change Ag in the year following the 2011 eruption.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com