The phrase "grave pollution" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a serious or severe level of environmental contamination.
Example: "The factory's waste disposal practices have led to grave pollution in the nearby river, endangering local wildlife."
Alternatives: "serious pollution" or "severe pollution."
In their report, Blacksmith Institute explains that in lower and moderate-income countries outside of North America and Western Europe, "pollution hotspots are poorly documented, and sometimes are completely unknown to local and national governments". With their report and field work, they hope to raise awareness about some of the gravest pollution threats in the world.
"It's completely false that India is not doing anything under the Paris agreement," said Jaiswal, noting that the country is seeking to expand solar and other forms of renewable energy both to lessen grave air pollution problems and also because the country has a vast natural solar resource.
Grave concerns about pollution and athletes donning masks disappeared after the fifth day, after heavy rains cleansed the skies and sun broke through for the opening of the track and field events.
Heavy metal pollution has been a matter of grave concern.
"China is still facing a grave situation in fighting pollution," Tao Detian, a spokesman for the Ministry of Environmental Protection, told the official China Daily newspaper.
If sustainable development is to be effective in tackling the grave dangers posed by pollution, the roles of politicians and activists are also part of it future.
They may easily understand that people die of malaria, obesity, alcohol or malnutrition, but may not appreciate the grave risks of air pollution.
At one point, he cited the Obama administration's warning about mercury pollution as a grave threat, and also quoted the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. — "no lie can last forever" — in expressing confidence that his reputation would survive the conflict with the producers.
Considering the immediate press coverage of the Michigan case, one could be forgiven for thinking the Supreme Court had "thrown out," "struck down," or "blocked" the mercury and air toxics standard (MATS) and put EPA's forthcoming carbon pollution standards into grave doubt.
