Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
But since, in order to meet the commission's requirement, the Tall Grass site would no longer be used for golf, the project would lose a significant economic safety net.
For example, at the short grass site, T. rosea had higher RGR than D. retusa and P. quinata under 2% light whereas both Tabebuia species performed better than other species at the tall grass site.
In this paper, datasets of three neighbouring plots (a common oak forest, a poplar plantation and a grass site) in Jászfelsőszentgyörgy are compared (Fig. 2).
Rates of anaerobic CH4 production ranged from 0.1 to 12,370 nmol kg− 1 s− 1 with the largest rates in the natural wetland with alder; the Reed Canary Grass site exhibited extremely slow rates of CH4 production.
Table 2 Correlation coefficients (r) between reference ET_PM and estimated ETgw values Stand 30-min scale Daily scale Oak-PM 0.95* 0.90* Poplar-PM 0.87* 0.67* Pasture-PM 0.83* 0.59* Oak-PM, poplar-PM and pasture-PM mean correlation between reference ET (PM_ET) and ETgw of oak site, poplar site and grass site, respectively *Significance of r is less than 0.01.
The uncertainty in Rn could contribute to a systematic error of about 20 W m−2 (21 ± 3 W m−2 at midday across the three sites), or 5% of Rn which is in consistent with the report by Twine et al. (2000) of 6% of midday and mid-season Rn at a grass site in Oklahoma.
Similar(51)
Total soil N stocks were 45% higher beneath leucaena rows compared to the paired grass sites at 0 0.1 m depth.
A chronosequence of leucaena stands (0 40 years) and paired grass sites were sampled to 1.0 m depth.
At the black grama grass and tobosa grass sites, 137Cs was uniformly distributed at the plant interspace scale.
A readily available Sy value of 0.05 was determined for the oak and the grass sites, while 0.1 was determined for the poplar site.
While all species had similar performance under 100% light on both short grass and tall grass sites, species growth differences were evident under 37 and 2% light levels.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com