Ai Feedback
Exact(4)
After completing these single-dimension tasks, participants completed an orthogonal task in which graphs varied in both size and contrast configurations.
All participants performed three bar graph judgment tasks: a size single-dimension task (Are the bars arranged [short tall] or [tall short]?), a contrast single-dimension task (Are the bars arranged [light dark] or [dark light]?), and an orthogonal task (graphs varied in both size and contrast, but only one dimension was task-relevant).
(R09) The trajectories recorded in residents' graphs varied most often with changes in rotations.
Although comments on specific graphs varied, several general views were expressed: Most respondents indicated that the intended meaning of the charts was not immediately evident upon visual inspection alone.
Similar(56)
The characteristics of electricity prices and electricity surcharge graphs vary with a 1-day, 24-h cycle.
Note that the horizontal axis is the z-score of a metric and that the scales in the three groups of graphs vary.
Together, these results suggest that participants experienced behavioral interference from the task-irrelevant dimension; thus, the ability to extract relevant relations in graphs may require well-developed top-down control, particularly when graphs vary along multiple dimensions.
The three graphs vary primarily in their absolute sizes.
Although this is the standard form, the terms on the columns or axes of the graph varies according to your doctor's preference.
Apparently, the linear correlations are obtained between the rotation speed of F1-beads and the flow velocity, even though the intercept of the graphs varies widely across the samples.
Importantly, these anchor points persisted in a task-dependent manner: When participants judged graphs that varied in both size and contrast (orthogonal task), preference ratios defined by the task-relevant dimension were significantly stronger than preference ratios defined by the task-irrelevant dimension.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com