From Figure 4, it is clear that all three sub-maps have few nodes with degree higher than 2, particularly in the cartilage sub-map (Figure 4C)), which has no proteins of degree larger than 2. The low number of hubs in the graphs implies that, from the analysis of these three sub-maps, we are not able to identify many potential drug target sites within each tissue type.
Gaps in the graphs imply that there were no articles published or no entity of the subclass was mentioned.
Computer-assisted image quantification (top graphs) implied that the rate of F-actin redistribution to the T/APC contact (hence cytoskeleton plasticity) was generally lower in the mutant vs. conventional tg T cells (despite higher steady-state levels), and lower in P14 vs. H-Y TCR-expressing cells (4.5× vs. 7.4× at 30 min).
These graphs imply that it is very important to exercise sufficient caution in using social distancing.
The shape of the contour lines differs between the graphs, implying that the optimal dose for reducing the attack rate may not be optimal for reducing the effective R and that the optimal dose can be strongly influenced by assumptions about the infectivity of breakthrough cases.
Since ({{mathrm{dom}}}(Upsilon )=mathfrak {H}_2), it follows that (Upsilon ) is closed, and the closed graph theorem implies that (Upsilon :mathfrak {H}_2rightarrow mathcal {H}^2) is bounded.
It is known that a monotone mapping M is maximal if and only if for ( x, f ) ∈ H × H, 〈 x − y, f − g 〉 ≥ 0 for every ( y, g ) ∈ Graph ( M ) implies that f ∈ M x.
Except of the port of Rijeka Croatiaa), the Greek (Piraeus, Volos and Salonica) and Bulgarian (Varna and Burgas) ports are the only Balkan ports located at the left part of the graph, which implies that they adversely influence the average pure technical efficiency of the other Balkan ports.
We first show that, for locally finite graphs and a certain family of metrics, completeness of the graph implies uniqueness of these extensions.
The above equality holds if and only if d G 1 ( u i ) = d G 1 ( u k ) for any u i, u k ∈ V ( G 1 ) and d G 2 ( v j ) = d G 2 ( v ℓ ) for any v j, v ℓ ∈ V ( G 2 ), that is, both G 1 and G 2 are regular graphs, which implies that G 1 ∘ G 2 is a regular graph.
