grants with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "grants with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is unclear and does not convey a clear meaning without additional context. Example: "The organization provides grants with specific criteria for applicants."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

He spearheaded fund raising activities and oversaw Foundation grants with gracious benevolence.

The New York Times

Many school districts supplement the grants with federal money appropriated to help poor children.

The New York Times

It funds everything from fellowships to large-scale collaborative grants with 20 plus partners.

The Guardian

The Gates Foundation, the world's largest, is taking a blended approach, combining grants with targeted investments.

The New York Times

Mr. Woetzel makes decisions about grants with Mr. Greenberg, Mr. Pennington and Mr. Stern.

The New York Times

The center will also compete for federal grants with the university sequencing centers involved in the Human Genome Project.

The New York Times

That way it could compare the expected returns of some grants with others — job training versus school tutoring, for instance.

The New York Times - Magazine

[The replacement of grants with loans is] a farcical insult dressed up as an act of generosity.

The Guardian

At one level, it is hard to understand how replacing taxpayer-backed grants with taxpayer-backed loans reduces government spending.

The Guardian

"He would go over grants with us, really putting an effort into it, which is something chairs rarely do".

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

It also means resisting a new list of favored panaceas and grants-with-strings, no matter how smart your ideas may be about accountability, testing, reading or discipline.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "grants with" as it is grammatically unclear. Rephrase to use clearer alternatives such as "grants including", "grants accompanied by", or "grants that include" for better readability and comprehension.

Common error

A common mistake is using "grants with" when trying to specify conditions or attributes of a grant. Instead of saying "grants with specific requirements", use "grants that have specific requirements" or "grants including specific requirements" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "grants with" typically functions as a prepositional phrase aiming to connect grants to associated conditions, elements, or resources. However, this construction is often grammatically weak and unclear, as noted by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Science

31%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "grants with" is frequently used but often grammatically incorrect, as stated by Ludwig AI. While it aims to connect grants to associated conditions or elements, it lacks clarity and precision. It appears across various contexts, including news media and scientific publications. For clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives, consider using phrases such as "grants including", "grants accompanied by", or "grants that include". These alternatives ensure better readability and comprehension.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

grants including

Replaces 'with' to specify that grants contain certain elements or features.

grants that include

Clarifies that grants have specific inclusions, changing the construction for better clarity.

grants accompanied by

Indicates that grants are given alongside something else, emphasizing co-occurrence.

grants supplemented by

Highlights that grants are being added to or enhanced by something else.

grants in conjunction with

Emphasizes that grants are working together with other resources.

grants combined with

Highlights the act of merging grants with other resources or initiatives.

grants alongside

Suggests that grants are running parallel to other efforts or funding.

grants allocated with

While still not grammatically perfect, aims to describe grants distributed alongside something else.

grants utilized together with

Expresses that grants are being used in combination with other resources.

grants paired with

Indicates that grants are specifically matched with another resource or element.

FAQs

How can I properly use the term "grants with" in a sentence?

While "grants with" is often grammatically incorrect, you can rephrase it to something like "grants including specific provisions" or "grants accompanied by guidelines" to ensure your sentence is clear and grammatically sound.

What are some alternatives to using "grants with" that maintain a similar meaning?

Consider using phrases like "grants that include", "grants coupled with", or "grants accompanied by" depending on the context. For example, instead of "grants with conditions", you could say "grants that include specific conditions".

Is it ever correct to use the phrase "grants with", and if so, in what context?

The phrase "grants with" is rarely grammatically correct in formal writing. It's better to rephrase the sentence to improve clarity and grammatical accuracy by using alternatives such as "grants that include" or "grants accompanied by".

What's the difference between using "grants with", and "grants that include"?

The phrase "grants with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and vague. A clearer and more grammatically sound alternative is "grants that include", which specifies that the grants contain or provide certain elements.