A currency scaling factor was chosen (£100,000 = 1 grant point) based on the total grant income of the two departments.
Within a given country, the currency unit of that country can be scaled appropriately in order to calculate these points, for example in Norway, where research grants are commonly of the order of millions of Kroner (NOK), a convenient scaling factor is 1 million NOK = 1 grant point.
(I wonder what they would say. "Warning: This Place is a Fire Trap"?) Ms. Grant points out that if a nursing home was inspected just recently, it could be more than a year, maybe even 18 months, before it could be forced into compliance.
As Teresa Grant points out in Drama Queen, an excellent essay included in The Myth of Elizabeth,*1 one of the many books about Elizabeth published in this quatercentenary year, Heywood's double bill was not only enormously popular between 1605 and the closing of the theatres in 1642, but survived well into the Restoration, when Pepys was still seeing it performed.
Applicants were granted points for employability, age and settlement factors and had to meet certain character and health requirements.
Grant points out that Locke believes a soldier who deserts from such a mission (Two Treatises 2.139) is justly sentenced to death.
Grant points out that because Dell is a direct seller it can still reap better margins in printers than most manufacturers do, but not on the order of magnitude that it does with PCs.
For 'innovation' criteria following 5 points could be used: 1. Alternative transportation, 2. Environmental education, 3. Company policy on green supply chain, 4. Life cycle cost analysis and, 5. Any other criteria proposed by the applicant for granting points for innovation criteria.
The universality of the laws of physics, which any good physicist takes for granted, points to a universality of reality.
In another case that same year, the Court invalidated a University of Michigan program that mechanistically granted points to members of various minority groups.
