Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(3)
Exact(1)
The SEM image in this catalog for one of the AMM grains is shown in Fig. 1 (sample name: Y98K11KS020).
Similar(59)
The Nd2Fe14B and NdO grains were shown to have low defect densities.
Approximately 60% of grains are shown to reorient to the [110] Z orientation under biaxial tensile loading, whereas the 40% left undergo high plastic deformation.
Figure 4 Contours of the averaged relative velocity of the grains are shown on the g D – R LD plane.
The frequency distributions of microboudinaged and intact columnar grains are shown in Fig. 6, and the proportions of microboudinaged grains are plotted in Fig. 7.
As such, there may be no very small grains in the IGM. Figure 3 shows the photoelectric heating rate per grain in a typical z ∼ 3 IGM environment with hard radiation; graphite grains are shown by solid lines and silicate grains are shown by the dashed lines.
In Figure 2c, the relative intensities of the S order parameter and a representation of the grain shape for each sample compared to that of pure SnO2 grains are shown.
This implies that larger Hdc or Hac field is necessary for practical applications in magnetic devices utilizing MAMR. Figure 4 Magnetization switching probability distribution for the Stoner-Wohlfarth grain at 400 K. Switching fields of the Stoner-Wohlfarth grains are shown in Figure 5 as a parameter of the incident angle of the dc magnetic field at T = 0 K.
In addition, the waxy grains were shown to have higher ethanol yield and greater conversion efficiency than the non-waxy grains, implying better quality for sorghum processing [ 6, 7].
In addition, some proteins such as class II chitinase and peroxidase 1 with isoforms in developing grains were shown to be phosphorylated by Pro-Q Diamond staining and phosphorprotein site prediction.
On the other hand, crystallographic orientation within a single grain is shown to vary substantially: in very large grains, misorientations as large as 35 deg.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com