Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
In vivo nude mice grafting data indicated that tumor growth with Snail1-overexpressed cells resisted IR compared to the control DLD-1 cell-grafted tumors.
Similar(59)
Histograms were constructed (Additional file 2) using these individual graft data.
For the remaining non-structural grafts data could only be obtained a single study.
There were no significant difference in donors' and graft data, recipients' data, intraoperative data, hemodynamic and kidney functioning data and outcomes in both groups.
In order to quantitatively assess the rate of union for non-structural autologous grafts, data were abstracted from 228 hindfoot fusions.
Lack of C1q or C3 in the donor skin did not significantly influence the rate of rejection of the male grafts (data not shown).
Double immunohistochemistry for GFP and MOG showed that neither Ct-SC nor STX-SC were present in MOG+ myelin in the graft (data not shown), intermediate zone (Fig. 7) or lesion (Fig. 5D and F).
We also observed that IFN-γR deficient Tregs had a reduced suppressIFN-γR deficientivo (four ouTregssix mice reconstituted withadaïve Teff and IFN-γreducedegsuppressiveabilityein skin grafts, data not shown).
16 In all nine published randomised controlled trials comparing rhBMP-2 with iliac crest bone graft, data for the main pain outcomes (Oswestry disability index, or neck disability index, SF-36 physical component score, back and leg pain) were available.
PH, Physical health, SF, Social functioning; MC, Medical care and satisfaction; TR, Treatment; FG, Fear of losing graft; Data are pearson's r correlation coefficient; significance of correlation coefficient tests were p<0.01 for all correlations.
Cell type analysis with specific markers showed a similar distribution of dopaminergic cell subpopulations within both graft types, with A9-like dopaminergic neurons (TH+/Girk2+) preferentially located in the graft-host border and A10-like (TH+/Calb+) dopaminergic neurons preferentially located in the centre of the graft (data not shown).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com