Suggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Steatosis was assessed as outlined by Kleiner et al. grading percentage involvement by steatotic hepatocytes as follows: grade 0, <5% grade 1, 5 33% grade 2, >33 66% and grade 3, >66%.
Similar(58)
All test specimens are geometrically-similar having the exactly same dimensions, concrete grade, percentage of longitudinal reinforcement, shear span-to-depth ratio, and grade of steel.
The average final grade percentage for PLTL-only students was 78.09 compared with 79.50 for the lab-only students.
aFrom specific expatriate staff grades, percentage full-time and length of time working on the project, travel and hotel costs.
The grade percentage achieved at the end of the 4-month intervention period was compared with that of the 4-month pre-intervention period.
The average final grade percentage for the students enrolled in both PLTL and lab was 80.64 compared with 78.09 and 79.50 for students enrolled in PLTL only or lab only, respectively.
The pathological features also disclosed no difference between the MN grade, percentage of glomerulosclerosis, tubulointerstitial fibrosis score, or fibrointimal atherosclerosis score between the two genotypes in MN patients (data not shown).
In a regression model of CRP (incorporating MIC-1, disease stage, tumour grade, percentage weight loss, diet score and KPS, i.e., those factors found to correlate with CRP), plasma MIC-1 concentration (P=0.003), diet score (P=0.001), and tumour grade (P=0.033) were significant determinants (r=0.179; Table 3).
In eighth grade, percentages were 90 and 57, versus 71 and 57 citywide.
Final student grades for pre and post app cohorts, where the goal was to measure the relationships between the average final grades (percentages) and the app engagement and uptake data; and.
Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS with the following data: Final student grades for pre and post app cohorts, where the goal was to measure the relationships between the average final grades (percentages) and the app engagement and uptake data; and The app usage analytics (such as scores achieved when using the app).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com