Exact(60)
F is a gradient field.
So, it's a gradient field.
Say that it is a gradient field.
Now it should be a gradient field.
So, indeed, this is not a gradient field.
And that means also it's a gradient field.
The third one, it's equivalent to F being a gradient field.
So, if you have a gradient field, it's what's called conservative.
We have said if we have a gradient field then we have this.
Could it be that, by accident, that vector field was a gradient field?
If you have a gradient field then it should have this property.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com