Sentence examples for governmental interpretation from inspiring English sources

As such, the term "Marriage" is not subject to governmental interpretation.

While it is undoubtedly true that in subsequent lectures Foucault laid great emphasis on power-as-government, or on a governmental interpretation of power, it is wrong to assume that Foucault passed from power-as-discipline to power-as-government, without seriously entertaining an analytic framework of power-as-war.

He generally ruled in favor of order over freedom as a result of his broad interpretation of governmental powers.

Fred M. Vinson, in full Frederick Moore Vinson (born Jan . 22 1890, Louisa, Ky., U.S. died Sept. 8, 1953, Washington, D.C.), American lawyer and 13th chief justice of the United States, who was a vigorous supporter of a broad interpretation of federal governmental powers.

January 22, 1890 Louisa, Kentucky September 8 , 1953Washington, D.C., United States Fred M. Vinson, in full Frederick Moore Vinson (born Jan . 22 1890, Louisa, Ky., U.S. died Sept. 8, 1953, Washington, D.C.), American lawyer and 13th chief justice of the United States, who was a vigorous supporter of a broad interpretation of federal governmental powers.

The prime minister had earlier asked a governmental advisory body for the interpretation of Clause 11 of the recently amended electronic crimes law.

He was the owner of Language Services International, a company that provided spontaneous interpretation services to international and governmental entities.

But the children's agency said the agreement reached on Friday by the UN Working Group, established to raise the standards in the Convention on the Rights of the Child for children in armed conflict, leaves too much open to interpretation, particularly as it regards governmental military forces and voluntary enlistment.

As IHME released GBD 2013 in late 2014 and CHERG released new 2012-based estinates in late 2014, deeper understanding will improve our interpretation of estimates, empowering governments, non-governmental organizations, and the broader international community to appropriately prioritize health interventions and make more efficient progress toward achieving the Millennium Development Goals.

According to Murray and Pruitt's interpretation, the plan was a classic case of governmental overreach; the E.P.A., they claimed, did not have the regulatory authority to impose emissions targets on individual states.

Under that interpretation, anchored by a Supreme Court ruling in 1939, Congress and local governmental authorities have great freedom to regulate the possession and use of firearms by individuals.