As Krahmann [ 7] summarises, "global governance is characterized by the need for greater collaboration among governments and nongovernmental actors as the result of states being faced with new and growing demands on the one hand and shrinking resources on the other".
The debate about corporate governance is characterized by shrill voices, a seemingly unbridgeable divide between shareholder activists and managers, rampant conflicts of interest, and rigidly held positions.
In their view, the new governance is characterized by networks in which the state and other organizations depend on each other.
At any rate, the entrepreneurial governance is characterized by limited liability.
Public governance is characterized by the use of quality indicators and performance management that enable local competition and benchmarking [ 23], thus explaining the relevance of coopetition theory in the public sector.
Current global health governance is characterized by a large number of powerful actors with different interests, values, and mandates [ 58] suggesting that the creation of a regulatory body for aid is likely to be a politically elusive goal.
