good to miss

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "good to miss" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts where one is expressing that it is beneficial or acceptable to overlook something. Example: "Sometimes, it's good to miss certain events to focus on what truly matters in life."

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Opportunity too good to miss".

The New York Times

She was too good to miss.

The New Yorker

But this is too good to miss.

Independent

It's too good to miss!

The Guardian

It's really too good to miss out.

Independent

They are too good to miss.

The Guardian

It was a sight too good to miss.

The Guardian - Books

The benefits are simply too good to miss.

The Guardian

"It all seems too good to miss anything out".

The Guardian - Music

For Sheibani, however, the chance was too good to miss.

The Guardian

Something different, something challenging - it sounded too good to miss.

The Guardian - Travel

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "good to miss", consider the context to ensure clarity. It's often more impactful to specify why something is "good to miss" for better understanding.

Common error

Avoid using "good to miss" as a blanket statement without providing context. Saying "this meeting is good to miss" without explaining why can come across as dismissive or disrespectful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "good to miss" functions as an adjectival phrase followed by an infinitive, describing something as being acceptable or even advantageous to skip. As Ludwig AI highlights, its usage, while common, isn't always grammatically precise.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "good to miss" is a commonly used expression that suggests something is acceptable or beneficial to skip. While its grammatical correctness is sometimes debated, as Ludwig AI indicates, its widespread use in news and media makes it an acceptable phrase in neutral contexts. When using it, be mindful of your audience and the specific context to ensure clarity and avoid potential misunderstandings. Alternatives like ""worth skipping"" or "beneficial to avoid" may be more appropriate in formal settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

worth skipping

Focuses on the value of skipping something due to its lack of importance.

acceptable to skip

Highlights the permissibility of omitting something.

beneficial to avoid

Emphasizes the positive outcome of not participating in something.

fine to pass up

Suggests that it is perfectly alright to decline an opportunity.

not essential to attend

Indicates that attendance is optional and not crucial.

okay to disregard

Implies that something can be safely ignored.

permissible to overlook

Focuses on the allowance to ignore something.

prudent to forego

Highlights the wisdom in abstaining from something.

reasonable to skip

Indicates that there is a valid reason to omit something.

wise to bypass

Emphasizes the intelligence in avoiding something.

FAQs

How can I use "good to miss" in a sentence?

You can use "good to miss" to describe opportunities or events that are not essential or beneficial to attend. For example, "That lecture was so boring it was "worth skipping"."

What's a more formal way to say "good to miss"?

In formal contexts, consider alternatives like "not essential to attend" or "beneficial to avoid" to maintain a professional tone.

Is it grammatically correct to say "good to miss"?

While commonly used, "good to miss" might be considered less grammatically precise than alternatives like ""worth skipping"" or "beneficial to avoid", which offer clearer grammatical structures.

When is it appropriate to use "good to miss"?

It's appropriate when you want to casually suggest that skipping something won't result in a significant loss, or might even be advantageous. Consider the audience and context to decide if a more formal phrasing is needed.